Is Shastra the Center of ISKCON?

Is Śāstra the Central Authority for ISKCON?

In May 2025 the Supreme Court gave Bengaluru ISKCON control of the Hare Krishna Hill temple, rejecting Mumbai ISKCON’s claims, but in October a split verdict on Mumbai’s review petitions sent the matter to a larger bench, suspending Bengaluru’s victory. Madhu Pandit Das had hailed the earlier ruling as vindication of the ritvik system, where Prabhupāda is believed to continue initiating disciples after his departure, yet the later review makes that claim uncertain. And since even highly learned judges and spiritual leaders can make mistakes, the deeper issue remains: how can anyone be certain that interpretations of Prabhupāda’s intentions—whether for or against ritvik initiations—are free from error?
Is ISKCON's Archana Paddhati Authorized?

Is ISKCON’s Arcana-paddhati Authorized?

This paper investigates the philosophical and practical standards of arcanā (Deity worship) within the Vaiṣṇava tradition, specifically addressing the apparent contradiction between scriptural authority (śāstra) and the Founder-Ācārya's simplified instructions for his neophyte disciples. The necessity for this harmonization was highlighted by the arguments presented by Suvyakta Narasimha Dāsa in his video, “How the GBC changed Deity worship in ISKCON”. Suvyakta Narasimha Dāsa raises two core objections to the standardized Arcana-paddhati (Deity worship manual) adopted by the institution, claiming they represent deviations from Śrīla Prabhupāda's original system.