A Brief Analysis of Prāṇadā devī dāsī’s book Rishikas & Vaishnavis: Women as Gurus
This paper critically examines Prāṇadā devī dāsī’s Rishikas & Vaishnavis: Women as Gurus, focusing on her claim that female dīkṣā-gurus in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava history were sādhakas rather than eternally liberated associates. Through textual analysis of sources such as Prema-vilāsa, Gaura-gaṇoddeśa-dīpikā, and Karṇānanda, the study finds that eleven of the fourteen cited women were siddhas, six of them nitya-siddhas, while the remaining cases lack sufficient evidence. The paper concludes that Prāṇadā’s argument is unsupported, as the historical record overwhelmingly portrays these Vaiṣṇavīs as perfected souls, not sādhakas, and stresses that doctrinal validation, not precedent, must establish eligibility for guru roles.



